Confirmation, Beligian Monks Know Beer

Previously I favourably reviewed the Trappistes Rochefort 6. On deck today is another contender by those wonderful monks, the number 10.

001-6207.jpg
Word on the street is that all three of the Rochefort offerings start out the same, and it is the alcohol content that really steers the differences between. The 10 being the highest of the range has a busty 11.2% ABV, and in other circles would no doubt be called a ‘quadrupel‘. 
The Pour:

The number 10 has a quick building head, consisting of fairly large bubbles

 which don’t stick around for very long. This is quite in line with the former experience with the 6, though I dare say the 10 built a larger head it could merely be the fault of a more enthusiastic pouring this time around. After only about 20-25 seconds a centimetre of smaller bubbles, in a rather fetching tan, are all that remain.
We are left with a dark ale, more brown than red in contrast with the number 6. Where there was a certain murkiness to the 6 the 10 has none, here just a strong sense of the opaque. Light seems to simply fall into the darkness that is the body of this hearty ale. 
Nose:
Forgive the constant comparisons to the 6, but this really is such a similar beer its hard to resist. Where there was a reminder of mead, and a honey sweetness to the nose of the 6, double it twice and you get the strong nose of the 10. This sweetness was so strong, I lost the notes fruitier notes that I encountered with the 6.
The strong alcoholic content makes itself known here as well, and with it notes of roasted malts and perhaps a hint of chocolate goodness.
001-6209.jpg

Taste:
First off, that eleven odd percent of alcohol? Definitely part of the experience of the 10. Its a knock on the door of ones sobriety, asking the polite question as to whether it wanted to retire for the evening because the time is to be merry. 
Alright so its not quite that strong, indeed the mere 9% of a Fin du Monde much better reflects this turn phrase, but I couldn’t quite resist after typing it out. The difference is that coupled with this strong alcoholic taste is a disarming sweetness that is equally strong. The effect is a smooth, slightly creamy feel on the tongue.
There is a heavy strong malt note that goes exceptionally well with the weaker apricot and plum notes. Overall, the sweetness would be overbearing, but the strong alcoholic content tempers it reasonably well. Oddly, where the nose clearly shows off the 11%, the taste has it masked, due to this sweet interplay.

Finish:
This is where the beer really shines. As the honey-mead dissipates, the fruit tones remain longer. This shows off how deceptively complex the beer is under all that sugar.  This is a strongly carbonated beer, and thus a proper sipper. This elongated, yet changing, finish complements the sipping approach quite well. One isn’t in the greatest rush for another sip, letting the taste buds speak volumes of that sip you took a few minutes ago.
Now I must confess, this tasting was preformed a couple weeks ago, I took down my impressions but didn’t quite get around to typing them up and posting.  Originally I wasn’t as keen as most others seem to be about this beer.  The number 10 is widely regarded as the best of breed from Rochefort.  For me, the sweetness hit in an overwhelming way, it really did remind me of a proper mead. The answer lies in the finish, that hit of sweetness fades a little as the beer warms up, but so much of the enjoyment of this ale is in the moments after. Where our honey-mead friend is in a much more casual back seat.
Upon the reflection allowed over the past couple of weeks,the individuality of the beer is quite striking, and the fact that it couldn’t be considered a daily ride shouldn’t be held against it.
This is the type of beer one would make a point to really take in. Sure a friend can come over and have a bottle as well, but frankly the conversation isn’t going to roam too far away from the sumptuous matter in hand. I’d say more, but I think I’m going to pop down the street and pick up a bottle instead…

Belgian Monks know beer

On deck is the “Trappistes Rochefort 6″, characterized by a bright red cap. Apparently its the hardest to track down outside of ‘specialty stores’, or so the internet claims. I grabbed it because it looked neat and vaguely familiar in the liquor store closest to my place here in Amsterdam. Our friends at wikipedia claim that production of 6 is only 1% of total beer production, its brewed only once a year. 
365-4830.jpg
The Roquefort brewery is a Beligan trappist brewery, so they can make goods to sell for to support the monastery. There are several examples of this in Belgium. This brewery is located in the Abbey of Notre-Dame de Saint-Remy, near the town of Roquefort home of that lovely cheese.  They have been operating as a brewery since 1595, and there are only ever 15 of them, or so the wiki goes.
Stored in a bottle, all Trappistes Roquefort can age for up to five years yielding differing tastes along the way. A rarity in the world of beer, to be sure. 

It pours a red-brown, muddy ice tea colour.  A quite frothy head forms, quickly dissipates leaving a semi-permanent layer throughout the remainder of the beer. 

On the subject of bubbles, the beer’s murkiness belies just how fizzy it is. Now this isn’t fizzy like your standard north american lager, just consistently small bubbles that open the flavour on each sip, giving the beer a light creaminess.  The nose reminded me of a mead, yeasty with honey, and caramel possibly a hint of plum as well.
365-4838.jpg
The notes from the nose continue on to the taste.  The yeasty-honey tastes, reminiscent of mead, are the core of the body, with raspberry and a touch of chocolate coming along for the ride. The last sip reveals cinnamon, or perhaps something else that lends a bit of spice to it.
Although its a hearty 7.5% alcohol the soft body hides this strength quite well. It’s finish is of a medium length, long for beer I suppose.  The fruitiness disappearing, with a grapefruit bitterness coming out as the rest fades. The long finish is slight sweetness and a sour note lingering well past five minutes after the last sip. 
At €2.60 a bottle, I really should have bought more than one.
365-4850.jpg

Cooking with Coolio (pt. 1)

I received quite the going away present from my dear friends Dr. David Dick and Erin Jensen; a cookbook. It’s name? “Cooking with Coolio

001-3923.jpgAnd before I go on, yes it is that ridonkulous. For example, after bragging about his ‘over two million hits of his youtube cooking, Coolio goes on to explain just how he became the king of the kitchen pimps, and how you can become a kitchen pimp too. 
Apparently the key is to follow the Ten Cool-mandments.
At any rate, upon receipt of this gift I had to promise to make use of said book, and report back.  This was a promise easily made, and here we are today. 
I chose a simple recipe to start out on my foray into kitchen pimpdom, “Cool-a-cado”, a simple recipe involving an avocado, tomatoes and onions, drizzled with olive oil and balsamic, then sprinkled with salt and pepper.
001-3932.jpg
First you chop the avocado halves length and width-wise leaving it in its skin. Chop the tomatoes and onions in the standard way.
001-3987.jpg
The rest is mere preparation, put the chopped tomatoes in the pit hole, sprinkle the onions on top of that. Then drizzle balsamic and olive oil, and salt n’ peppa and you’re done. Coolio doesn’t say to squeeze the avocado to loosen the flesh, but I find this works well to let the liquids seep in. He does say to poke cut the flesh to allow for the absorption of the vinegar and oil, but after you’ve done all the other stuff it seems like all it would do is ruin your plating…
001-4002.jpg
So that looks alright, except that even cutting Coolio’s ingredients down to half an onion and a small tomato leaves us with quite a bite of leftovers, so we plate again.
001-4053.jpg
So that’s the cool-a-cado. Now, don’t forget your dime bag of salt, and nickel bag of pepper.
There’s more info on Coolio’s cooking after the jump.

Read more of this post